Realist Evaluation of Technology Initiatives

PhD Research: Approaches to evaluating digital technology in the contemporary university

The activities undertaken during this PhD were set in the context of working as a practitioner-researcher over a ten year period, from 2006 – 2016. The research was motivated from my background in design, and experiences in roles such as technologist, software developer, project researcher, project manager and IT manager. In the early years, the aim was to enhance teaching and learning within the curriculum using emerging technologies: working directly with academics to adapt and adopt successful technologies into their courses. Subsequent activity centred around externally funded projects and government funded initiatives where there were more formal requirements from funders to demonstrate success or potential wider impact of the development and embedding of technology in the university.

The pace of change began to accelerate during that period, both within UK HE and technologically, which was juxtaposed with government funding cuts to the sector. The necessity for the Higher Education community to adapt helped establish the importance of the research along with a growing requirement for critical reflection and continuous improvement from professional accreditation bodies such as the Higher Education Academy. There was a need to read more, learn from others, understand and utilise educational theories and models on technology adoption, and undertake more rigorous and focused research – hence the PhD. There was a shared desire to make fewer mistakes; to become wiser and more creative in the design, development and embedding processes; to make better decisions about areas that would benefit from technological developments and conversely areas where it was unhelpful or damaging to students, staff and institutions.

A good proportion of that period of time was spent working as part of a vanguard of like-minded researchers and practitioners trying to innovate in the field of educational technology. Innovation, not only in new technologies or pedagogies, but particularly with this research, innovation in the way that we understand what works (and what does not) and more importantly why. This research attempted to uncover evidence that is based upon more than anecdotal accounts from an inner circle of technology evangelists. The driving force was to undertake research that is understood and received as a rigorous evidence-base upon which sound strategic decisions can be made. Particularly in the context of institutions needing to invest more of their own money in technology enhanced teaching and learning.

The overarching professional aim was (and still is) to engage in research-informed development of technology that is not only usable but useful and used.


To cite this research please use:
King, Melanie (2017): The realist evaluation of educational technology. Loughborough University. Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/27554

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE. This thesis considers the best way to address the challenges faced by educators, institutions and funding bodies trying to not only develop and implement educational technology successfully but tackle the challenge of understanding and evidencing what works (and what does not) and why. The aim of the research was to find and validate an evaluation method that provided usable and useful evidence.

APPROACH. A range of evaluations were undertaken to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches, augmented by drawing upon the experiences and outcomes published by others. An analysis of the issues was made and significance of the problem established. The problem being premature timing, unsuitable models, rapid change, complex implementation chains, inconsistent terminology, ideology and marketisation. A tailored realist evaluation framework was proposed as an alternative method and it was tested to evaluate an institutional lecture capture (LC) initiative.

FINDINGS. The theory-driven realist approach provided a level of abstraction that helped gather evidence about wider influences and theories of potential future impact of the LC programme and its linked policy. It proved valuable in generating real and practical recommendations for the institution, including what more could be done to improve uptake and support embedding in teaching and learning, from practice, policy and technological points of view. It identified some unanticipated disadvantages of LC as well determining how and when it was most effective.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS. A Realist Evaluation of Technology Initiative (RETI) framework has been produced as tool to aid the rapid adoption of the approach. Recommendations for future research and seven guiding principles have been proposed to encourage the formation of a community of realist evaluative researchers in educational technology.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE. The rigorous application of a tailored realist evaluation framework (RETI) for educational technology (including the development of two Domain Reference Models) is the primary contribution to new knowledge. This research is significance because it has potential to enable the synthesis of evaluation findings within the sector. This will enable an evidence-base of what works, for whom, in which contexts and why, ultimately benefiting policy-makers and practitioners to support better informed decision making and investment in education.

This PhD has been done via Publications and comprises a covering chapter (the thesis below) and 10 supporting publications.


Converting the physical to the virtual: providing a laboratory experience for distance learners in engineering

Blanchard, RE, Moron Garcia, SD, Bates, MR (2006) Converting the physical to the virtual: providing a laboratory experience for distance learners in engineering. In m-ICTE2006, The IV International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communiction Technologies in Education 2006, Seville, Spain, p.1208, ISBN: 84-690-2472-8. Read full paper …